In recent years the entry for has nearly quadrupled. A site to help anyone submit a Freedom of Information request. In November approximately 40, UK students entered , most of whom achieved a D in summer Ofqual monitored the awarding of the elements of this specification in summer and reviewed the awards in autumn in the light of concerns expressed by some schools. Make a request Browse requests View authorities Journalist? CIE did tighten their outcomes at C and, to a lesser extent, at A. As is normal practice, we have already turned our attention to the summer grading.
Other papers had more marks between A and C. During the grading period, CIE provided us with copies of the evidence they were using, and we held several meetings with them via telephone during July. Request a different format. Any dissemination or copying of this email or attachments is strictly prohibited unless you are the intended recipient or are responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient. Tom Scoville, 10 February Run by Volunteers and powered by Alaveteli.
The award was more severe and so more in line with GCSE standards than inbut there was no evidence to suggest that CIE had tightened the award beyond what was intended and beyond the usual adjustments that exam boards routinely make on the basis of post-award evidence. Other papers had more marks between A and C. As in summer, CIE provided us with the evidence they were using and we discussed this with them.
Request a different format. Paper 2 marks are added to those of either Paper 3 or 4 according to the papers the student has taken to determine the overall grade.
Below is the exam of which the grade boundaries I am enquiring: Ofqual monitored the awarding of the elements of this specification in summer and cokrsework the awards in autumn in the light of concerns expressed by some schools.
It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
Dedicated to Chris Lightfoot. Sign in or sign up. If you use assistive technology and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications ofqual. Ultimately I’d like to know how close I might have been.
Again, we were content that their grading decisions were appropriate. Run by Volunteers and powered by Alaveteli. A site to help anyone submit a Freedom of Information request.
The main difference between them is that includes speaking and listening in the overall grade whereas camnridge optional speaking and listening separately. UK entries for are far higher than for because only is approved by the Department for Education for use in maintained schools.
We concluded there was no case to re-open the award.
This supports similar analyses conducted by Cambridge Assessment. Both use the same assessments, students take the same papers and they have the same grade boundaries.
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account.
Donate and support our work. Please tell us what format you need. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.
Summer As is normal practice, we have already turned our attention to the summer grading. WhatDoTheyKnow also publishes and archives requests and responses, cambridgw a massive archive of information. The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act and unless legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this email and boundadies reply cannot be guaranteed. We grare entry data from CIE and made clear our expectation that they will aim to improve the spread of marks on Paper 2 this summer.
CIE told us that they intended to tighten their grade standards at C and, to a lesser extent, at A. McKenzie 25 January Delivered.
In response to those concerns, in October Ofqual reviewed the available technical evidence provided by CIE in July. For summerCIE proposed to tighten their grade standards. PDFKB9 pages. Write to your politician. They also mean that papers do not differentiate between students as intended.