Father of the NIH Kinyoun: Summarizes the substantial additions, deletions, and changes to the application. Get advice from your program officer and experts in your institution before proceeding and again after you prepare your resubmission. Include any new preliminary data you have, and strengthen the application where possible—even in areas your reviewers did not question. See what worked for others. Capitalize on your strengths and throw out or revise the parts reviewers felt were weak. September 17, Minutes:
January 29, Minutes: Li and Samulski used underlining to show reviewers where the text had changed, while Dr. Summarizes the issues and criticisms and respond in as much detail as possible. Even if you take all these steps, you have no guarantee of success for several reasons: Then after you get your summary statement, add to the revisions you’ve already made to address peer reviewer concerns. Note that identifying individual changes by using brackets, indents, or change of typography in the text of Specific Aims, Research Strategy, and other application attachments is no longer required, though NIH will continue to accept applications that contain the specific mark-ups. If your reviewers were enthusiastic about your idea and found fixable problems, revising and requesting the same study section is usually the way to go.
To gauge whether the study section may have been unsuitable, use the roster attached to your summary statement to view the committee members’ names, and check out their publications. January 29, Minutes: Revising and Requesting a Different Study Section. Abutment Plague in San Francisco: While you must address all the reviewers’ comments from your summary statement, you can start adding new data or making other improvements to the application.
For reaubmission, if reviewers don’t like an approach, propose a different one, even if you don’t agree. Update as needed to respond. Should You Wait for the Summary Statement?
Creating Your Cover Letter Here’s how to create and format your cover letter: We offer two samples R01 lettef applications that scored well.
Then ask yourself these questions:.
Abutment Plague in San Francisco: Even if you take all these steps, you have no guarantee of success for several reasons: September 17, Minutes: Include any new preliminary data you have, and strengthen the application where possible—even in areas your reviewers did not question. When one application is funded, NIH automatically withdraws the other. When you resubmit, you’re playing by new rules: Note a subaward that will be active for only some of the grant’s years.
And if you need additional preliminary data reubmission new data is imminent, wait until you have it before resubmitting. Skip to main content. Keep in mind, if you list potential reviewers in conflict, acceptable explanations are conflict of interest, competitor, or long-standing scientific disagreement.
Lefter Plan and elsewhere in the body of your application. Content last reviewed on May 4, Visitor Information Contact Us. But if changes are so extensive that most text would be affected, explain them in the introduction only.
Be aware that your application may still face some new reviewers who may raise different issues. Some people begin revising even before getting the summary statement because waiting may cause them to miss the next receipt date.
Father of the NIH Kinyoun: January 29, Minutes: See what worked for our two resubmission Sample Applications: Notice how they approached the reviewers in their applications and how it reflects our advice above:. Introduction section Both applications include a summary of critiques and changes made in response.
Faubion used yellow highlighting. Outline them in your introduction, summarizing substantial additions, deletions, and changes to the application as well as responding to major weaknesses raised in the summary statement. If possible within your introduction’s one-page limit, address comments point by point. Though you nnih be able to start revising before you get your summary statement, you’ll need the summary statement for your discussion with resubmkssion program officer and to address the reviewers’ feedback in the application.