Mathematical Universe Hypothesis mathematical monism. Essays That Presented Arguments Based Upon Quantum Mechanics Primary in this category is the essay by Biswaranjan Dikshit It is difficult to make sense of what is being discussed since the author is not presenting a thesis based upon mainstream quantum mechanics but upon his theory called free will theory, or biased will of nature theory. A try of debate for Platonism was given by Peter Martin Punin. Of course there is always a larger controversy about whether public funding is well spent but this is a different matter. Among the diverse essays in this contest we can find expressions of diverse philosophical views, that I would consider mainly classified in 2 dimensions, with indications their respective favorite interpretations of quantum mechanics, and representative members in this contest and elsewhere.
The essay contest is funded by relatively small amounts of private money. Retrieved 12 February Unfortunately his analysis is tedious and difficult to follow in its intricate details. Obscurantism Anti-Platonism Deny the amazing efficiency of mathematics observed in physics; stay ignorant about it. Because average humans who “care” often have a big bias for obscurantism i.
Unfortunately his analysis is tedious and difficult to follow in its intricate details. With out my score, you can easily figure out how absurdly affordable their evaluation could esday been.
His essay Where The Question Leads addresses the issue that the topic needs refining, but he asserts conclusively: Scientism Platonism Recognize with R. The period of stagnation has lasted for forty years now. It attempts to implant into the basis of microscopic behavior, a material cause that explains the other three causes of Aristotle. The content of a theory is usually specified by describing separately the physical states that are possible in the theory, known as its kinematics, and the rules that govern how one state evolves into another, or its dynamics.
However I have the feeling that A: Now what is amazing with the success of mathematics is that this spinor space E was found to be “what electrons and other fermions are actually made of”. Situation remains the same for the long length scale limit of string models which choses the easy way and just assumes the existence of QFT limit at long length scales and ends up with landscape catastrophe. Ready to celebrate this impressive milestone? Wigner, Casey Blood, J.
He explained his motivations for creating ViXra in his essay, Open Peer Review to Save the World which also had high community and public ratings.
But the essay of Philip Gibbs does not fsxi this “quality”. The mainstream thinking is that Poincare symmetries are symmetries fqsi general relativity. What did I find in reading the essays? But it’s not even that he tries to defend any obscurantist ideology there: However, as said, the dimensions themselves, and the relationship among them like, the inertia, expressed by the special relativity, as the relationship between time and extension were fixed very at the beginning, when almost no mathematics existed yet, and thos should be simple, not complicated.
Eesay all of this is worthless nonsense up to the moment when someone actually finds a theory that can achieve at least everything good that the theories that obey the principles achieved — and maybe something extra — out of a starting point that drops these principles. A thorough conceptual housecleaning is needed.
Here are 3 quick suggestions for which fundamental assumptions are holding physics back. This is pure lack of imagination. The purpose of this essay is to discuss my impressions and comments resulting from reading the submissions to the FQXi Essay Contest.
Well, these people are Christians Gora Gorovich on Who should get the Nobel Prize…. I would like to attend the 4th FOXi essay contest with an adapted version my Vixra letter called:.
This we should separate from a next problem, the theory of the elementar particles. May 30, at 9: Then is fxi a clash between the cells of the Obscurantism column. The main flaw is the thesis that the contest is aimed essau discussing, is that goal oriented behavior is essentially that defined by human beings who desire that nature is describable by mathematical law rather than designed by a cosmic agent such as God. Why does not SR fit in gravity?
Nonetheless, science, in many ways, acts as if the opposite is guaranteed by some universal law. We vividly feel that they do, but as physicists we are not used to accept feelings as proofs.
Among the diverse essays in this contest we can find expressions of diverse philosophical views, that I would consider mainly classified in 2 dimensions, with indications their respective favorite interpretations of quantum mechanics, and representative members in this contest and elsewhere.