Bringing them on the ship letting them die because of no treatment, using the slaves to find gold for Columbus and having them carry him in a hammock. Howard Zinn unequivocally mentioned his thesis regarding first chapter in several places in his book “A people’s history of the United States”. Nevertheless,we should not accuse or judge Columbus for his actions Rather it was necessary for progress of America to occur pg. What was the ultimate fate of the Arawak Indians? Do you agree or disagree with it and why? In Haiti, he enslaved entire tribes, ordering them to search for gold or be killed.
All men of conscience or prudence ply to windward, to maintain their wars be defensive. When I was reading A peoples history of the united states by Howard Zinn, the thesis that really interested me in chapter one is when Columbus says page 18 paragraph 1 lines 1 and two”how certain are we that what was destroyed was inferior? I would have to agree with what Howard Zinn is saying, not because it isn’t important, but because it would in fact accomplish nothing that will substantially change the way we go about learning history, and nothing we do know can changed what happened over years ago Email required Address never made public. He is saying that why they need to fight for something they can simply have.
Identify one early and one subsequent motive that drove Columbus to oppress indigenous peoples. What is your opinion on his thesis?
Please note the page and paragraph numbers Paraphrase his thesis in your own words. When chief Powhatan refused to return the English men that went to look for protection during the starving period, the English burned houses, killed some Thesie, took the queen and her children and killed them.
Morison is basically saying that mass murder took place, but its not that important and should not affect our judgment towards Columbus. Africans had turned on each other, capturing rival tribes to be taken to slave traders in return for European goods and weapons.
He does not omit the story of mass murder; indeed he describes it with the harshest word one can use: We should not celebrate him for his discoveries because he killed many natives. This statement seems clear his neutrality on his thesis in his own perspective. Howard Zinn unequivocally mentioned his thesis regarding first chapter in several places in his book “A people’s history of the United States”. I agree cause those people felt a lot of pain.
Zinn idealizes Indian society, suggesting that it was an enlightened utopia, in which people were treated more or less equally. They really trusted him and was welcomed to their Aztec society. Jamestown was set up inside an Indian association led by the Indian chief Powhatan.
I do disagree with his thesis.
You are commenting using your Google account. They wanted to finance the monarchial bureaucracies that were happing in Western Europe.
What was the significance of Quetzalcoatl? His thesis is different from other historians because thesiis aren’t his words being emphasized, this isn’t his knowledge of our history these are actual people who actually cha;ter in those time periods and how different events affected them as individuals.
Most school textbooks paint Columbus as a hero, and either ignore his genocidal crimes altogether or mention them very briefly. The Puritans also looked to Psalms 2: In response, Indians massacred English men, women, and children.
He is saying that he and his people will give them whatever they want if they are willing to approach in a friendly manner. Reply Leave a Reply.
He says the cry of the poor is not always just that means sometimes slaughtering poor people might be justifiably. Why, Zinn asks, are we so sure that the Indian culture that the Europeans destroyed was inferior to European culture?
The statement basically means that sacrifice have to be made sometimes in order to go forward, but in order to make certain sacrifices, you have to think and make better decision. As a result, ordinary people may come to accept violence as basic parts of history, and, perhaps, of the present, too. Many slaves died on the voyage and never made it out of the hull of the slave ships. The slave trade in North America originated because plantation owners in the South need large amounts of cheap labor and there was not enough European servants coming to the Chaptr.
He thought gold was a sign of being very wealthy.